<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Douchetard of the Week - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-78288c78" type="application/json"/><link>http://douchetard.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:36:01 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Michael Savage:  Radio Personality, Brat, and Douchetard</title><link>http://douchetard.info/?p=10#comment-1026039</link><description>You are right.  People should face consequences for their hateful speech.  I'm a civil libertarian, and sometimes I forget that civil liberty doesn't necessarily grant free license.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're also right that controversy sells.  He was doing his job and generating controversy.  Ugh.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dogboi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:36:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Michael Savage:  Radio Personality, Brat, and Douchetard</title><link>http://douchetard.info/?p=10#comment-1012608</link><description>"Having the right to say idiotic and douchie things" does not mean never  having to face negative consequences for anything you say. Firing him would be a perfectly reasonable response and wouldn't violate his rights like you seem to be suggesting. &lt;br&gt;Anyway, not supporting his sponsors/stations like you suggest would be putting pressure on his employers to have him fired. &lt;br&gt;It'll never happen though, controversy sells, and I'm sure his ratings are doing great</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:41:53 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>